I am going to take off my long T Jul 36 call here on today’s bounce, as it’s at risk of decaying quite quickly, and is a low probability trade at this point. I initially bought T with a bounce off the 200 day ma in mind. When that failed, I was forced to manage the trade to salvage my premium. I sold the June 36 call at 0.40 against my initial position, and that call expired worthless, helping to reduce my original cost basis of 0.73 down to 0.33. I am now selling the July 36 call at 0.21, resulting in a 0.12 net loss against my original 0.73 outlay.
Action: Sold to Close the T ($35.40) July19th 36 Call at $0.20 for a $0.13 loss (off an original cost basis of $0.73)
Trade Update June 6, 2013:
I have watched T since my entry around the 200 day moving average, and the stock fell right through that important technical level much more severely than I anticipated. On its bounce back to near my entry level today, I’m going to make an adjustment on the trade:
Action: Sold to Open the T ($35.82) June22nd 36 Call at $0.40
New Position: Long the T June22nd / July 36 Call Calendar for $0.33
Trade Rationale: This adjustment is designed to reduce my near-term risk of a move lower in T, which I view as more likely since it broke so quickly through the 200 day ma that I had marked as support, and has not been able to break back above $36 all week. However, I still like the longer-term prospects for T, so I want to hold on to my July 36 call in the interim.
Original Trade May 30, 2013:
A few months ago, dividend stocks were all the rage. Investors and traders were stumbling over themselves to buy 2-5% dividend yield names, every other metric be damned. The best performing sectors in the 1st quarter were health care, staples, utilities, and telecom, a rare occurrence in a strong 10% run for the broader market.
How much a difference one month makes. In the past month, those sectors have been thrown by the wayside, as cyclicals have re-asserted their leadership. Sentiment towards defensives has rapidly swung from enamored to hated, just one more example of the fickle nature of market psychology.
One name that has followed that ride up and down is T, the largest telecom name in the U.S. (at $193 billion market cap, vs. $141 billion for VZ). The 1 year chart shows the run-up and smack down to start this year:
The stock ran from 33 to 39 to start the year, and has quickly fallen back to its 200 day ma (black) around 36 in the past month. But on a fundamental basis, T looks much more attractive than the majority of “defensive” names in this market. It’s a 5% dividend yield name, projected to grow earnings 9% per year over the next 2 years, priced at a 15 P/E, and in a secular growth area with very high barriers to entry.
A major reason for the selloff in T (and other defensives) has been the move higher in bond yields in the U.S. as bonds have sold off. However, even the bond selloff looks like it might be overdone based on the price action this week. Here is the chart of TLT showing the breakdown on strong bounce-back:
The 114.62 level that was the March low was broken on Tuesday, but TLT has quickly rebounded and is holding above that level for the second straight day. If TLT’s breakdown was a false breakdown, and bonds stabilize here, then high yielding stocks are likely to catch a bid once again. Given that T is a 5% yielder, it would be at the top of that buy list.
TRADE: T ($36.00) Bought the July 36 Call for $0.73
-Bought 1 July 36 Call for $0.73
Break evens on July Expiration:
-Losses of up to 0.73 between 36 and 36.73, max loss of 0.73 at 36 or below
-Profits above 36.73
Trade Rationale: AT&T has a low implied volatility of only 14.50, which makes buying outright options particularly attractive, especially since 30 day realized vol is around 20, and 100 day realized vol is around 16. The 50 day moving average around 37.30 is obvious resistance, but a move to that level would be almost a double for the July 36 call that I’m buying, and my first target to exit the trade.