Earlier in the month we tried playing CHK from the short side (see earlier comments below) as we thought the news was likely to get worse before it got better, and given how bad we perceived the news concerning the company, we thought that implied vol was just too low.
Last week the stock made a 3 year low and has since recovered almost 20% aided by reports that Carl Icahn took a large stake in the company. We are in the camp that the addition of agitating activist investors is not always a shareholder friendly event (see YHOO).
Our Current View on CHK:
- Its founder, Aubrey McClendon is under serious heat for multiple ethical breaches ($1.1 billion personal loan against oil and gas well stakes, ran a $200 million hedge fund on the side that traded in same marketplace as CHK)
- Reported weak earnings at the beginning of May due to low natural gas prices.
- As stated above the stock has recently rallied 20% as Icahn reportedly has bought 4% of the company and other shareholders are pushing for better corporate governance (Southeastern, CALPERS).
We remain bearish and believe the news is likely to get worse before it gets better and we found a creative way to get short exposure with defined risk out to Jan13 expiration. We are kind of trading junkies if u haven’t noticed, so we traded both structures, but we particularly like the first as we think the odds of making a lot of money on this trade are far better than the 2nd.
TRADE 1: Outright Bearish Bet or a great way to get protection for a long with limited risk.
CHK ($16.00) Bought Jan13 12.50/7.50 1×2 Put Spread for .50
- Bought 1 Jan13 12.50 Put for 2.36
- Sold 2 Jan13 7.50 Puts for a total of 1.86 (.93 each)
Break-Even on Jan13 Expiration:
- Profits of up to 4.50 btwn 12.00 and 3.00, max gain of 4.50 at 7.50
- Losses of up to .50 btwn 12.00 and 12.50, max loss of .50 above 12.50 on the upside.
-The downside risk is a little different. The trade actually loses money below 3.00, but we anticipate getting out of the structure well before then if the stock ever gets into the single digits. For completeness though:
-Losses between 3.00 and 0, max loss of 3.00 (premium paid of 0.50 plus 2.50 of downside risk) if stock goes to 0. Which we assign a low probability of, but still your max risk on the extreme downside is defined.
TRADE 2: Black Swan Structure
CHK ($16.00) Bought the Jan13 10/5 1×2 Put Spread for .60
- Bought 1 Jan 10 Put for 1.56
- Sold 2 Jan 5 Puts for a total of .96 (.48 each)
Break-Even on Jan13 Expiration:
- Profits btwn 9.40 and .60 make up to 4.40, max gain at 5.00, make full 4.40 or 7.3x your money.
- Losses of up to .60 btwn 9.40 and 10 and btwn .60 and Zero, .60 IS YOUR MAX RISK.
Trade Rationale: The Jan13 1×2 put spread risks 60 cents to make $4.40 max payout, and is a great risk/reward way to play for an implosion in the stock, and/or initiate protection in case CHK’s asset sales don’t go as planned, and the bond market’s worst fears come to pass. It gives you until past the end of the year for your trade to work.
Original Post May 2, 2012 at 2.27pm: Chesapeake (CHK): A Trader’s Dream, An Investor’s Nightmare
The story of Chesapeake and its founder, CEO, and Chairman, ceases to amaze even the most hardened market watchers. Here’s a story of a plush billionaire running a public company worth tens of billions of dollars, and he still couldn’t seem to focus on his main task of running one of the largest natural gas companies in the world. As far as dramatic character stories go, it doesn’t get much more interesting than this one.
To summarize, Reuters reported 2 weeks ago that McClendon had taken $1.1 billion in personal loans against his stakes in Chesapeake oil and gas wells. That first barrage of news occurred after the stock had already gradually declined from $25 to near $20, likely on general business fears given the continued weakness in natural gas prices, and caused a break down to $17.5 on big volume. The stock seemed to base around that level for a week, and news that McClendon was stripped of his Chairman title seemed to signal that the Board of Directors and management was prepared to clean up the mess and move on.
After yesterday’s close, just when it finally seemed like the buyers had regained control, pushing the stock briefly above $20, and the news flow had turned incrementally positive, Chesapeake not only reported a big miss on earnings but more importantly, Reuters reported this morning that McClendon had been running a personal hedge fund of $200 million on the side, trading commodities similar to what Chesapeake does as a business. It’s one thing to take out a loan against your personal assets, as suspicious as that may be, but to compete in the same market as your company, on a personal basis?!? Our mental alert level just went from cautious to extreme danger.
In this environment of uncertainty, even with the stock at $17, implying a forward P/E of around 8 if the stock can meet next year’s consensus estimates, a naked long stock position seems too risky. Mr. McClendon is not a run-of-the-mill CEO, but rather the founder who infused his freewheeling style into the culture of the company. Whatever your long term view of the stock, the leadership saga is likely to continue until McClendon is eventually forced to leave.
Fortunately, options are surprisingly cheap given the recent headlines and volatility in the name. Our first instinct was to look for a cheap way to play a bounce in the name, but today’s headlines about the personal hedge fund caused us to re-assess that view. Another serious worry came from the commentary from Chesapeake on the conference call today, as Mr. McClendon seems to digging in for a fight with the media, not willingly stepping down. Moreover, weak gas prices does create a funding problem, highlighted here by the FT. Finally, Southeastern, the largest shareholder just came out and indicated its desire to seek talks with Chesapeake management, and the stocks quick 5% pop and then selloff indicates more selling ahead for the next week in CHK. So here’s our short-term play on this headline-heavy story:
TRADE: CHK ($17.25) Bought the May 16 Puts for .48
-Break-even on downside is 15.52, lose up to .48 btwn 15.52 and 16 and max loss of .48 above 16 on May 19th expiration.
I WILL LOOK TO TURN INTO A PUT SPREAD ON ANY SEVERE WEAKNESS AND LOCK IN GAINS.
RATIONALE: Generally we don’t like pressing shorts like this, but this could be the gift that keeps on giving. I wouldn’t short the stock outright, but to risk 2.5% of the underlying that we get another eye opening revelation before May expiration is a bet I am excited to make.
ALTERNATIVELY if you are long and not sure what to do, but you think there is a decent likelihood that the stock makes back some recent losses, but the worry of further declines outweighs the potential positives, you could consider stock replacement.
LONGS could consider selling their stock and buying the May19th 18 calls for .55 (stock ref 17.06), this will give you reltively cheap upside exposure with defined risk.